Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with and without Heart Failure in Primary Care / Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida em Pacientes com e sem Insuficiência Cardíaca na Atenção Primária

Abstract Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue with implications on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Objective: To compare HRQL, estimated by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), in patients with and without HF in the community. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 633 consecutive individuals aged 45 years or older, registered in primary care. The subjects were selected from a random sample representative of the population studied. They were divided into two groups: group I, HF patients (n = 59); and group II, patients without HF (n = 574). The HF group was divided into HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF - n = 35) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF - n = 24). Results: Patients without HF had a mean SF-36 score significantly greater than those with HF (499.8 ± 139.1 vs 445.4 ± 123.8; p = 0.008). Functional capacity - ability and difficulty to perform common activities of everyday life - was significantly worse (p < 0.0001) in patients with HF independently of sex and age. There was no difference between HFpEF and HFrEF. Conclusion: Patients with HF had low quality of life regardless of the syndrome presentation (HFpEF or HFrEF phenotype). Quality of life evaluation in primary care could help identify patients who would benefit from a proactive care program with more emphasis on multidisciplinary and social support. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Resumo Fundamento: A insuficiência cardíaca (IC) é um importante problema de saúde pública, com implicações na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde (QVRS). Objetivo: Comparar a QVRS, estimada através do Questionário SF-36 (Short-Form Health Survey), em pacientes com e sem IC na comunidade. Métodos: Estudo transversal incluindo 633 indivíduos consecutivos com idade igual ou superior a 45 anos, registrados na atenção primária e selecionados de uma amostra aleatória representativa da população estudada. Foram divididos em dois grupos: grupo I, pacientes com IC (n = 59); e grupo II, pacientes sem IC (n = 574). O grupo I foi dividido em pacientes com IC com fração de ejeção preservada (ICFEP - n = 35) e pacientes com IC com fração de ejeção reduzida (ICFER - n = 24). Resultados: Pacientes sem IC tiveram um escore médio do SF-36 significativamente maior do que aqueles com IC (499,8 ± 139,1 vs 445,4 ± 123,8; p = 0,008). A capacidade funcional - habilidade e dificuldade para realizar atividades comuns da vida diária - foi significativamente pior (p < 0,0001) nos pacientes com IC independentemente de sexo e idade. Não houve diferença entre ICFEP e ICFER. Conclusão: Pacientes com IC mostraram baixa qualidade de vida a despeito da apresentação da síndrome (fenótipo ICFEP ou ICFER). A avaliação da qualidade de vida na atenção primária poderia auxiliar a identificar pacientes que se beneficiariam de um programa de atenção à saúde pró-ativo com maior ênfase em suporte multidisciplinar e social. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with and without Heart Failure in Primary Care.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major public health issue with implications on health-related quality of life (HRQL). OBJECTIVE: To compare HRQL, estimated by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), in patients with and without HF in the community. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including 633 consecutive individuals aged 45 years or older, registered in primary care. The subjects were selected from a random sample representative of the population studied. They were divided into two groups: group I, HF patients (n = 59); and group II, patients without HF (n = 574). The HF group was divided into HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF - n = 35) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF - n = 24). RESULTS: Patients without HF had a mean SF-36 score significantly greater than those with HF (499.8 ± 139.1 vs 445.4 ± 123.8; p = 0.008). Functional capacity - ability and difficulty to perform common activities of everyday life - was significantly worse (p < 0.0001) in patients with HF independently of sex and age. There was no difference between HFpEF and HFrEF. CONCLUSION: Patients with HF had low quality of life regardless of the syndrome presentation (HFpEF or HFrEF phenotype). Quality of life evaluation in primary care could help identify patients who would benefit from a proactive care program with more emphasis on multidisciplinary and social support. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).